欧洲盘是赌球的主导
欧洲盘已经有数十年的历史，而且在赔率设定方面已经是非常成熟，虽然近年新增了不少下注方式，但最近的报告显示53%的注码是落在欧洲盘身上，而新兴的亚洲盘只有12%占有率，所以欧洲盘依然是赌球的主导。
亚洲盘的发展已经有十多年历史，但未能取代欧洲盘的地位，主要原因是过份有利庄家。亚洲盘的发展源于把可能的结果由主客和三个机会，变成上盘及下盘两个机会，在发展的初期的确给予大家不少甜头，但操盘手技术日渐成熟，而且庄家抽水已成为下注的障碍，亚洲盘发展至今已成为庄家最忠实的赚钱工具。
为何重新选择欧洲盘
欧洲盘的体系始终较成熟，而且临场赔率变化较小，加上没有庄家抽水，所以欧洲盘还是足球博彩的主流。现时欧盘的赔率是由欧洲的大型博彩公司开出，然后世界各地的中小庄家将会根据这些资料来开盘，从而再计算出亚洲盘的盘口及水位，这个过程是相当转接。
向来料源头出发
欧洲的第一手来料数据必定是欧洲盘，而亚洲不少报料公司把欧洲来料再套用到亚盘身上，并改变成他们的亚盘料，这样一来是本末倒置，二来把来料的准确度大大降低。所以，要在赌球上赚钱，必须向来料的源头出发，而欧洲盘来料是唯一选择。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Win/Draw/Win is the leader of
soccer odds
European odds has Several
decades of history, also the odds is in a mature setting.
Although a lot of new betting methods appear in recent years,
and a recent report shows that 53% of the bet spend on the
European odds, and the Asian odds only has 12% of share. So, it still lead in the soccer
odds.
Asian odds has been
developed for ten years, but it cannot replace the status of
European odds, because it’s over favorable for the banker. The
development of the Asian odds from three outcome Win/Draw/Win
to two possible outcome Over/Under. In the early stage, it
gives out some benefits for us. But the techniques of the
trader become more skilled, affiliated with the odds, Asian
odds becomes the most faithful tools
for the banker to win.
Why we choose
European odds again?
The system of
European odds still more mature than others, also the changes
in odds is smaller. As a result of European odds still lead in
the soccer odds. Nowadays, the Europe Betting company set up a
odds, banker all over the world will be based on these data to
follow. Then switch the information into Asian odds, the
process is quite complex.
Get it from the
source
The first-hand tips
must be European odds, Some Asian tips company apply the
European odds tips into Asian odds tips. It is useless and
also, the accuracy of the tips will drop. So, If you want to
win money, you must get the tips from the source, the European
odds is the only choice.
|
